Make (Integromat)
by Celonis SE (Make/Integromat)
Visual automation platform connecting apps with powerful logic.
Score
Score
Our verdict
Make (formerly Integromat) is the best visual automation platform for teams that need complex, multi-branch workflows at a fraction of Zapier's cost. Its canvas-based editor with routers, iterators, and aggregators handles automation complexity that Zapier simply cannot match. It is best suited for operations teams, developers, and agencies managing sophisticated integrations. The main caveat is a steeper learning curve than Zapier and fewer app integrations (2,000 vs 8,000+).
Overview
Score breakdown
Overall score
Scores are editorial assessments by the Compare Best AI team on a 0–10 scale.
Expert review
CBAI Editorial Team
Compare Best AI · Editorial Team
Make has established itself as the power user's automation platform, offering a visual canvas-based workflow builder that handles complex logic far more elegantly than Zapier's linear approach. With routers for conditional branching, iterators for looping through data, aggregators for combining results, and error handlers for robust fault tolerance, Make gives technical users the control they need.
How we tested
Days tested
14 days
Tasks evaluated
- ·Complex multi-branch workflow creation
- ·Data transformation pipeline
- ·Error handling and retry testing
- ·API integration with HTTP module
- ·Operation consumption analysis
- ·Comparison with Zapier on identical workflows
Method
Side-by-side with Zapier Professional and n8n Cloud on identical automation scenarios
Reviewer
CBAI Editorial Team
Plans & pricing
Free
Individuals exploring automation with generous limits
- 1,000 operations/month
- 2 active scenarios
- Unlimited modules per scenario
- 15-minute scheduling
- No team features
- No priority execution
Core
Individuals and small teams with regular automation needs
- 10,000 operations/month
- Unlimited active scenarios
- 5-minute scheduling
- Priority execution
- Data stores
- No team features
Pro
Teams needing advanced features and collaboration
- 10,000 operations/month
- Everything in Core
- Custom variables
- Team collaboration
- Full-text execution log
- Priority support
Teams
Growing teams with complex automation requirements
- 10,000 operations/month
- Everything in Pro
- Team roles and permissions
- Shared connections
- Scenario lock
- Advanced analytics
Enterprise
Large organizations with compliance and high-volume needs
- Custom operations
- SSO and SCIM
- Advanced security
- Dedicated support
- SLA guarantees
- Custom deployment
Pricing may vary by region. Always verify on the vendor's website.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | Zapier | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Builder | |||
| Visual canvas editor | |||
| Routers and conditional branching | |||
| Native loops (iterators) | |||
| Reliability | |||
| Error handlers | |||
| Integrations | |||
| App connections (2,000+) | |||
| Custom HTTP module | |||
| Pricing | |||
| Free tier (1,000 ops) | |||
| Cost per 10K operations | |||
| Deployment | |||
| Self-hosting option | |||
Is it right for you?
Good fit for
Operations teams
Visual canvas with branching, looping, and error handling creates robust automation for complex business processes.
Agencies managing clients
Build and maintain complex integrations across multiple client accounts at a fraction of Zapier's cost.
Developers and technical users
HTTP module, custom functions, and data stores enable custom API integrations and data transformations.
High-volume automation users
10,000 operations for $9/month vs Zapier's 750 tasks for $19.99/month — up to 15x better value.
Less suited for
Non-technical beginners
The canvas interface has a steeper learning curve than Zapier's guided linear builder; beginners should start with Zapier.
Users needing 8,000+ integrations
Make's 2,000 apps cover most needs but Zapier's 8,000+ library has more niche and specialized connectors.
Self-hosting requirements
Make is cloud-only; n8n is the better choice for teams needing self-hosted automation.
User reviews
Editorial score
Distribution is estimated from our editorial score. Verified user reviews coming soon.
Use cases
Typical ways teams rely on this tool — from everyday tasks to specialized workflows.
- Workflow Automation
- Data Transformation
- API Integration
- E-Commerce Automation
- CRM Workflows
- Marketing Automation
- AI-Powered Workflows
Integrations
Reported connectors
Apps and services commonly connected out of the box or via official connectors.
- Google Workspace
- Slack
- HubSpot
- Salesforce
- Shopify
- Airtable
- Notion
- OpenAI
- Stripe
- Mailchimp
- Discord
- GitHub
- Jira
- Asana
- WordPress
Privacy & compliance
Security & data practices
Highlights we track from the vendor's documentation. Always confirm current terms, subprocessors, and regional policies on their official site.
- SOC 2
- GDPR-ready
- SSO/SAML
Details
Category
Price
- Free (1,000 ops)
- Core $9/mo
- Pro $16/mo
- Teams $29/mo
- Enterprise custom
Free version
Best for
- Complex multi-step workflow automation with branching logic
- Developer-friendly automation with API calls and data transformation
- Agencies building automation workflows for multiple clients
Frequently asked questions
Make (Integromat)
Automation & AI Ops
Ready to get started?
Visit the Make (Integromat) website to explore plans and start your free trial.
Was this page helpful?
Compare Best AI may earn a commission when you click links on this page. This does not influence our editorial scores or recommendations. Advertiser disclosure